Introduction
211 project was initiated by the Chinese government in the late 1990s as a way to improve the quality of education in China’s top universities. However, not all schools who received the designation under 211 project have been successful in maintaining their academic standards. This article examines the 20 worst universities under 211 project.
First Tier of Worst Schools
Of the 20 universities identified as the worst under 211 project, the first tier of schools includes those with glaringly low academic standards. These schools are known for rampant corruption among faculty and administration, low retention and graduation rates, and a lack of quality research output. These schools include China University of Mining and Technology, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, and Henan Polytechnic University.
Second Tier of Worst Schools
The second tier of the worst schools under 211 project are those with inferior academic standards but have made some efforts to improve. However, their efforts have not brought about significant changes, and they continue to struggle with maintaining quality academic programs. These schools include Dalian University of Technology, Northwestern Agriculture and Forestry University, and Southern Yangtze University.
Third Tier of Worst Schools
The third tier of the worst schools under 211 project includes schools with comparatively better academic standards but still suffer from insufficient resources and a lack of faculty with adequate qualifications. These schools include Hebei University of Technology, Jiangsu University, and Shenyang Normal University.
Conclusion
The 211 project was a good initiative by the Chinese government to improve the quality of higher education in China. However, some universities have failed to meet the expected standards, and are struggling to keep up with changing academic landscapes. The 20 universities identified in this article are the worst offenders, often criticized for their insufficient academic performance, and lack of quality research output. It is imperative that these schools take swift and decisive actions to improve their academic programs and regain their credibility in the academic world.
Introduction
211 project was initiated by the Chinese government in the late 1990s as a way to improve the quality of education in China’s top universities. However, not all schools who received the designation under 211 project have been successful in maintaining their academic standards. This article examines the 20 worst universities under 211 project.
First Tier of Worst Schools
Of the 20 universities identified as the worst under 211 project, the first tier of schools includes those with glaringly low academic standards. These schools are known for rampant corruption among faculty and administration, low retention and graduation rates, and a lack of quality research output. These schools include China University of Mining and Technology, Shijiazhuang Tiedao University, and Henan Polytechnic University.
Second Tier of Worst Schools
The second tier of the worst schools under 211 project are those with inferior academic standards but have made some efforts to improve. However, their efforts have not brought about significant changes, and they continue to struggle with maintaining quality academic programs. These schools include Dalian University of Technology, Northwestern Agriculture and Forestry University, and Southern Yangtze University.
Third Tier of Worst Schools
The third tier of the worst schools under 211 project includes schools with comparatively better academic standards but still suffer from insufficient resources and a lack of faculty with adequate qualifications. These schools include Hebei University of Technology, Jiangsu University, and Shenyang Normal University.
Conclusion
The 211 project was a good initiative by the Chinese government to improve the quality of higher education in China. However, some universities have failed to meet the expected standards, and are struggling to keep up with changing academic landscapes. The 20 universities identified in this article are the worst offenders, often criticized for their insufficient academic performance, and lack of quality research output. It is imperative that these schools take swift and decisive actions to improve their academic programs and regain their credibility in the academic world.
原创文章,作者:Admin,如若转载,请注明出处:http://www.mingpinfang.com/126386.html